{"id":8053,"date":"2011-11-08T09:06:55","date_gmt":"2011-11-08T09:06:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.burckhardtlaw.com\/publication-pdf\/note-zu-5a_611-2011-vom-8-november-2011-willkuerkognition-des-bundesgericht-beim-nachweis-auslaendischen-rechts-gemaess-art-16-abs-1-iprg\/"},"modified":"2011-11-08T09:06:55","modified_gmt":"2011-11-08T09:06:55","slug":"note-zu-5a_611-2011-vom-8-november-2011-willkuerkognition-des-bundesgericht-beim-nachweis-auslaendischen-rechts-gemaess-art-16-abs-1-iprg","status":"publish","type":"publication-pdf","link":"https:\/\/www.burckhardtlaw.com\/fr\/publication-pdf\/note-zu-5a_611-2011-vom-8-november-2011-willkuerkognition-des-bundesgericht-beim-nachweis-auslaendischen-rechts-gemaess-art-16-abs-1-iprg\/","title":{"rendered":"Note zu 5A_611\/2011 vom 8. November 2011, Willk\u00fcrkognition des Bundesgericht beim Nachweis ausl\u00e4ndischen Rechts gem\u00e4ss Art. 16. Abs. 1 IPRG"},"content":{"rendered":"
[vc_row row_height_percent=\u00a0\u00bb0″ override_padding=\u00a0\u00bbyes\u00a0\u00bb h_padding=\u00a0\u00bb0″ top_padding=\u00a0\u00bb0″ bottom_padding=\u00a0\u00bb0″ overlay_alpha=\u00a0\u00bb50″ gutter_size=\u00a0\u00bb3″ column_width_percent=\u00a0\u00bb100″ shift_y=\u00a0\u00bb0″ z_index=\u00a0\u00bb0″ uncode_shortcode_id=\u00a0\u00bb974157″][vc_column column_width_percent=\u00a0\u00bb100″ gutter_size=\u00a0\u00bb3″ overlay_alpha=\u00a0\u00bb50″ shift_x=\u00a0\u00bb0″ shift_y=\u00a0\u00bb0″ shift_y_down=\u00a0\u00bb0″ z_index=\u00a0\u00bb0″ medium_width=\u00a0\u00bb0″ mobile_width=\u00a0\u00bb0″ width=\u00a0\u00bb1\/1″ uncode_shortcode_id=\u00a0\u00bb125198″ el_class=\u00a0\u00bbsmaller\u00a0\u00bb][vc_column_text uncode_shortcode_id=\u00a0\u00bb827669″]ZZP 2012, Nr. 2, 167 ff., Helbing & Lichtenhahn, Basel\/Genf\/M\u00fcnchen[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text text_lead=\u00a0\u00bbsmall\u00a0\u00bb uncode_shortcode_id=\u00a0\u00bb367251″]<\/p>\n